WebMay 2, 2024 · On 05/02/2024 DDR Holdings, LLC filed an Intellectual Property - Patent lawsuit against Booking com B. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, Delaware … WebNov 22, 2024 · DDR HOLDINGS, LLC: Defendant / Appellee: BOOKING.COM B.V. Case Number: 23-1177: Filed: November 22, 2024: Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal …
IPR2024-00436, No. 9 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted …
DDR sought $6.04 million in damages for NLG's infringement of the '572 and '399 patents; NLG countered with $375,000. The parties agreed on a verdict form that instructed the jury to award a single sum to compensate DDR for NLG's infringement of the asserted claims found to be infringed and not invalid. J.A. … See more DDR is the assignee of the '572 and '399 patents. The '572 and '399 patents are both continuations of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,135 (the '135 patent), which has a priority date of … See more We turn first to the district court's denial of Digital River's motion for JMOL of invalidity of the '572 patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 102(a). A patent claim is anticipated if a single prior art reference expressly or inherently discloses … See more Since the denial of a motion for JMOL is not patent law-specific, regional circuit law applies. The Fifth Circuit reviews the denial of a JMOL motion de novo. See, e.g., Harris Corp. v. Ericsson Inc., 417 F.3d 1241, 1248 … See more NLG also contends that the district court erred by denying its motion for JMOL that the asserted claims of the '572 and '399 patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Since the '572 patent is invalid as anticipated under 35 … See more WebNov 22, 2024 · Case Summary On 11/22/2024 DDR Holdings, LLC filed an Intellectual Property - Patent lawsuit against Priceline com LLC. This case was filed in U.S. Courts … guild wars 2 battle of claw island bug
Craige Thompson – DDR Holdings v Digital River Case Study.
WebDec 10, 2014 · The newly issued decision in DDR Holdings LLC. v. Hotels.com [3] gives some hope that e-commerce software claims can indeed be patent-eligible if the "claimed solution is necessarily rooted in... WebThe DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com decision finding a computer-implemented invention patent eligible was authored by Judge Chen and joined by Judge Wallach. Judge Mayer … WebMay 13, 2016 · Diehr and DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com cases, there are two main ways to claim software inventions to avoid § 101 issues. First, one can claim the software controlling other machines or components. Not unlike Diehr, when claimed with an appropriate level of specificity, such inventions may be viewed as an improvement to an industrial process. bournemouth marriott highcliff booking.com